Should wehelpthe poor Yourdiscussion should includeeither Essay

Should wehelpthe poor Yourdiscussion should includeeither Poggesarguments (in Poverty,Climate Change and Overpopulat - Essay ExampleAs one of the many life-threatening social issues, pauperisation is associated to many deaths, including diseases and violence, curiously in the underdeveloped countries. (Pogge, 2010). A great factor in the increase of poverty is the unequal distribution of wealth, which leads to social inequality. The economic inequality skews the economic opportunities of concourse to gain the financial stability they pauperisation to ensure a life without poverty. The more than unequal the distribution of wealth is, the greater number of people on that capitulum is at the bottom of the economic and social structure. Pogges argument on parcel the poor simply explains that the lower the poverty level is, the higher(prenominal) the sustainability would be. Helping the poor means the participation needs to exert its efforts on the redistribution of wealth. This is a very big and idealistic step in the eradication of poverty. Since poverty is caused by the unequal structure, specifically economic, of the society, completely taking out poverty is next to impossible. Pogge suggests a number of points on how to deal with poverty, thus helping out the poor people, and, as a result, helping out the society and the environment in one blow. In this regard, Pogge suggests that the society have a moral obligation to help the poor just because it will result in everyones self-preservation. One of the main arguments of Pogges perspective is that of Rolstons. Rolston actually criticizes the point of Pogge that the society has the moral obligation to help the poor. He insists that helping out the poor, and the quest to eradicate poverty will paralyze our society. Its not that society has no resources to help out the poor but in focusing more on eradicating poverty, the resources would be used up and the society wont be able to answer to the other chall enges that the society is facing, such as financial capability and ecological burden. Rolston suggests that if the society aims to eradicate poverty, it would need to look into the following challenges as well redistribution of wealth, economic sustainability and population control (Rolston, 1996). Although affluent societies have the resources to answer these social issues, most poverty-stricken countries dont have the capacity to do that. And the lingering question would be would the affluent societies pursue the value of preserving the life of other societies while maintaining their own? Would they have the heroism to redistribute their wealth to ensure that other societies would have the financial capabilities that they are enjoying? Rolston even suggests that most individuals protect what they value most, even if it results to the demise of another, taking it to pecker that it is beyond their control (Rolston, 1996). This is similar to Newtons law of cause and effect. Every d ecision that we make affects other people, whether directly or indirectly. Rolstons point shows that one of human natural characteristics is self-preservation, and this could have a result in the downfall of another. Another point that contradicts Pogges perspective is the problem of population. Rolston suggests that provide the poor is like feeding cancer (Rolston, 1996). It will only result to more problems later since the poor will only give birth to more poor later on. This correlates to his perspective that if the socie